{"id":14596,"date":"2004-02-03T19:45:52","date_gmt":"2004-02-04T00:45:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/devnawl.nawl.ca\/?p=14596"},"modified":"2025-06-19T13:34:34","modified_gmt":"2025-06-19T17:34:34","slug":"14596","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/","title":{"rendered":"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"

La Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme est un instrument important des droits de la personne. Pourtant, elle contient une clause pr\u00e9voyant le droit \u00e0 la vie \u00ab en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de la conception \u00bb. La ratification de la Convention pourrait donc avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes pour les droits des femmes en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 reproductive au Canada. L\u2019ANFD a \u00e9crit au ministre des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res pour soulever la question \u00e0 savoir si le Canada doit ratifier la Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme.<\/p>\n

Cette lettre est disponible seulement en anglais.<\/em><\/p>\n

Honorable Bill Graham, February 2004<\/a><\/p>\n

Honorable Pierre Pettigrew, August 2004<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>Honorable Bill Graham
\nMinister of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
\nGovernment of Canada<\/p>\n

February 2004<\/p>\n

Honorable Minister,<\/p>\n

I am writing to inform you of some of the concerns of the National Association of Women and the Law (NAWL) regarding ratification by Canada of the American Convention on Human Rights, to request that your Department undertake in-depth research on the gender-based impact of such ratification and to ask that you consult with equality-seeking women\u2019s groups on this issue.<\/p>\n

In the last two years, NAWL has held a number of discussions regarding ratification by Canada of the American Convention on Human (ACHR) and we recently participated in the \u201dMulti-stakeholder Meeting\u201d that was organized by your Department prior to the Special Summit of the Americas in Monterrey. At that meeting, you indicated that you understood that women\u2019s groups had abandoned their reluctance to endorse ratification of the ACHR. Although as a general principle, NAWL supports the strengthening of human rights instruments and mechanisms in the Americas, we are currently not in a position to endorse ratification of the ACHR until we have the assurance that women\u2019s sexual autonomy and reproductive rights, including the right to abortion, will be effectively be guaranteed within that framework.<\/p>\n

NAWL believes that Canadians could benefit from ratification of the American Convention on Human Rights if the accompanying Optional Protocol (the San Salvador Protocol on social, cultural and economic rights), the Interamerican Convention against violence against women, and the Convention against torture were ratified simultaneously. Also, it is likely that people across the Americas would gain from Canada\u2019s increased engagement with the regional human rights system, increased funding and support to its institutions, as well as the easier reference to Canadian law and jurisprudence.<\/p>\n

However, it is obvious to us that Article 4.1 of the ACHR stands as a significant obstacle to ratification, since it can be interpreted in ways that would seriously damage the human rights of women in Canada. Indeed, article 4.1 of the Convention explicitly guarantees the right to life \u201cin general, as of the moment of conception\u201d. This Article can be interpreted in such a way as to seriously interfere in a woman\u2019s life, liberty and security of the person, as we understand them in Canadian law. To sign on to the Convention without specific, carefully researched safeguards would represent a gross violation of women\u2019s equality rights, and once again subject women to second-class citizenship. The Senate Standing Committee on Human Rights has recognized the serious threat that article 4.1 of the Convention could pose to women\u2019s rights, and it has recommended that ratification not be done without special measures to ensure the protection of women\u2019s rights to abortion.<\/p>\n

At the Multi-stakeholder meeting of December 16, you stated that your Department was poised to review it\u2019s position on the ratification of the Convention. Has the Department of Foreign Affairs conducted research on the options for ratification that address article 4.1 and women\u2019s rights to reproductive and sexual autonomy? More specifically, has it evaluated the respective merits of a reservation, an interpretive declaration and a conditional interpretive declaration? Has it explored other possible means of ratifying the Convention in such a way as to effectively ensure the full protection of women\u2019s reproductive and sexual autonomy, and in particular the right to abortion ?<\/p>\n

We are writing to request a meeting with you at your earliest convenience to discuss these issues, and to explore the possibility of holding a national consultation with women\u2019s equality-seeking groups on these questions.<\/p>\n

Yours truly,<\/p>\n

Andr\u00e9e C\u00f4t\u00e9
\nDirector of Legislation and Law Reform
\nNational Association of Women and the Law<\/p>\n

Encl.: The English and French version of NAWL\u2019s discussion paper on the ratification of the ACHR<\/p>\n

++++++++++++++++++++++++++<\/p>\n

<\/a>Honourable Pierre Pettigrew
\nMinister of Foreign Affairs
\nHouse of Commons, Ottawa<\/p>\n

Wednesday, August 11, 2004<\/p>\n

Minister Pettigrew,<\/p>\n

I am writing on behalf of the National Association of Women and the Law to congratulate you on your recent appointment to the Cabinet as Minister of Foreign Affairs.<\/p>\n

I would like to take this occasion to inform you of some of the concerns of the National Association of Women and the Law (NAWL) regarding ratification by Canada of the American Convention on Human Rights, to request that your Department undertake in-depth research on the gender-based impact of such ratification and to ask that you consult with equality-seeking women\u2019s groups on this issue.<\/p>\n

In the last two years, NAWL has held a number of discussions regarding ratification by Canada of the American Convention on Human (ACHR). Although as a general principle, NAWL supports the strengthening of human rights instruments and mechanisms in the Americas, we are currently not in a position to endorse ratification of the ACHR until we have the assurance that women\u2019s sexual autonomy and reproductive rights, including the right to abortion, will be effectively be guaranteed within that framework.<\/p>\n

Indeed, it is obvious to us that Article 4.1 of the ACHR stands as a significant obstacle to ratification, since it can be interpreted in ways that would seriously damage the human rights of women in Canada. Article 4.1 of the Convention explicitly guarantees the right to life \u201cin general, as of the moment of conception\u201d. This Article can be interpreted in such a way as to seriously interfere in a woman\u2019s life, liberty and security of the person, as we understand them in Canadian law. To sign on to the Convention without specific, carefully researched safeguards would represent a gross violation of women\u2019s equality rights, and subject women to second-class citizenship.<\/p>\n

During the federal election campaign, Prime Minister Martin repeatedly reassured Canadians that he would defend women\u2019s reproductive rights, and in particular the right to have an abortion. We trust that your ministry will share those views, and take all necessary measures to ensure that Canada\u2019s international policy does not jeopardize those rights in any way. The Senate Standing Committee on Human Rights has recognized the serious threat that article 4.1 of the Convention could pose to women\u2019s rights, and it has recommended that ratification not be done without special measures to specifically ensure the protection of women\u2019s rights to abortion.<\/p>\n

I am writing to inquire whether the Department of Foreign Affairs has conducted research on the options for ratification that address article 4.1 and women\u2019s rights to reproductive and sexual autonomy? More specifically, has it evaluated the respective merits of a reservation, an interpretive declaration and a conditional interpretive declaration? Has it explored other possible means of ratifying the Convention in such a way as to effectively ensure the full protection of women\u2019s reproductive and sexual autonomy, and in particular the right to abortion ?<\/p>\n

We are writing to request a meeting with you at your earliest convenience to discuss these issues, and to explore the possibility of holding a national consultation with women\u2019s equality-seeking groups on these questions.<\/p>\n

Yours truly,<\/p>\n

Andr\u00e9e C\u00f4t\u00e9
\nDirector of Legislation and Law Reform
\nNational Association of Women and the Law<\/p>\n

For the members of NAWL\u2019s Working Group on Reproductive Rights and the Americas<\/p>\n

c.c.: Madame Liza Frulla, Minister Responsible for the Status of Women<\/p>\n

Encl.: The English and French version of NAWL\u2019s discussion paper on the ratification of the ACHR<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme est un instrument important des droits de la personne. Pourtant, elle contient une clause pr\u00e9voyant le droit \u00e0 la vie \u00ab en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de la conception \u00bb. La ratification de la Convention pourrait donc avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes pour les droits des femmes en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 reproductive au Canada. L\u2019ANFD … Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"rs_blank_template":"","rs_page_bg_color":"","slide_template_v7":"","_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[834],"tags":[983],"class_list":["post-14596","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lettre-ouverte","tag-convention-americaine","no-post-thumbnail"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nWomen\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights | Association nationale Femmes et Droit<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"La Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme est un instrument important des droits de la personne. Pourtant, elle contient une clause pr\u00e9voyant le droit \u00e0 la vie \u00ab en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de la conception \u00bb. La ratification de la Convention pourrait donc avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes pour les droits des femmes en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 reproductive au Canada. L\u2019ANFD a \u00e9crit au ministre des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res pour soulever la question \u00e0 savoir si le Canada doit ratifier la Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights | Association nationale Femmes et Droit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"La Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme est un instrument important des droits de la personne. Pourtant, elle contient une clause pr\u00e9voyant le droit \u00e0 la vie \u00ab en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de la conception \u00bb. La ratification de la Convention pourrait donc avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes pour les droits des femmes en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 reproductive au Canada. L\u2019ANFD a \u00e9crit au ministre des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res pour soulever la question \u00e0 savoir si le Canada doit ratifier la Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"National Association of Women and the Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2004-02-04T00:45:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-19T17:34:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/NAWL-fb-og-image.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"NAWL Administrator\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"NAWL Administrator\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/14596\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/14596\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"NAWL Administrator\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2dbe2702423328393e18cdcbada21da9\"},\"headline\":\"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights\",\"datePublished\":\"2004-02-04T00:45:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-19T17:34:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/14596\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1325,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Convention am\u00e9ricaine\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Lettre ouverte\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/14596\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/14596\\\/\",\"name\":\"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights | Association nationale Femmes et Droit\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2004-02-04T00:45:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-19T17:34:34+00:00\",\"description\":\"La Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme est un instrument important des droits de la personne. Pourtant, elle contient une clause pr\u00e9voyant le droit \u00e0 la vie \u00ab en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de la conception \u00bb. La ratification de la Convention pourrait donc avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes pour les droits des femmes en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 reproductive au Canada. L\u2019ANFD a \u00e9crit au ministre des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res pour soulever la question \u00e0 savoir si le Canada doit ratifier la Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/14596\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/14596\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/14596\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/\",\"name\":\"National Association of Women and the Law\",\"description\":\"Advancing feminist law reform in Canada since 1974\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"NAWL\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The National Association of Women and the Law\",\"alternateName\":\"NAWL\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/08\\\/fb-OFFRE-DEMPLOI-.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/08\\\/fb-OFFRE-DEMPLOI-.png\",\"width\":940,\"height\":788,\"caption\":\"The National Association of Women and the Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2dbe2702423328393e18cdcbada21da9\",\"name\":\"NAWL Administrator\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/473d6670c85d99a4bfc81f9449fbba6c5af5929c30af5c5c96bd9e252a554faa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/473d6670c85d99a4bfc81f9449fbba6c5af5929c30af5c5c96bd9e252a554faa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/473d6670c85d99a4bfc81f9449fbba6c5af5929c30af5c5c96bd9e252a554faa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"NAWL Administrator\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/nawl.ca\\\/fr\\\/author\\\/nawl-admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights | Association nationale Femmes et Droit","description":"La Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme est un instrument important des droits de la personne. Pourtant, elle contient une clause pr\u00e9voyant le droit \u00e0 la vie \u00ab en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de la conception \u00bb. La ratification de la Convention pourrait donc avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes pour les droits des femmes en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 reproductive au Canada. L\u2019ANFD a \u00e9crit au ministre des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res pour soulever la question \u00e0 savoir si le Canada doit ratifier la Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights | Association nationale Femmes et Droit","og_description":"La Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme est un instrument important des droits de la personne. Pourtant, elle contient une clause pr\u00e9voyant le droit \u00e0 la vie \u00ab en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de la conception \u00bb. La ratification de la Convention pourrait donc avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes pour les droits des femmes en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 reproductive au Canada. L\u2019ANFD a \u00e9crit au ministre des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res pour soulever la question \u00e0 savoir si le Canada doit ratifier la Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme.","og_url":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/","og_site_name":"National Association of Women and the Law","article_published_time":"2004-02-04T00:45:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-06-19T17:34:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/NAWL-fb-og-image.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"NAWL Administrator","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"NAWL Administrator","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/"},"author":{"name":"NAWL Administrator","@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#\/schema\/person\/2dbe2702423328393e18cdcbada21da9"},"headline":"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights","datePublished":"2004-02-04T00:45:52+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-19T17:34:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/"},"wordCount":1325,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#organization"},"keywords":["Convention am\u00e9ricaine"],"articleSection":["Lettre ouverte"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/","url":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/","name":"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights | Association nationale Femmes et Droit","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#website"},"datePublished":"2004-02-04T00:45:52+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-19T17:34:34+00:00","description":"La Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme est un instrument important des droits de la personne. Pourtant, elle contient une clause pr\u00e9voyant le droit \u00e0 la vie \u00ab en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de la conception \u00bb. La ratification de la Convention pourrait donc avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes pour les droits des femmes en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 reproductive au Canada. L\u2019ANFD a \u00e9crit au ministre des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res pour soulever la question \u00e0 savoir si le Canada doit ratifier la Convention am\u00e9ricaine des droits de l\u2019Homme.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/14596\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Women\u2019s Reproductive Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#website","url":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/","name":"National Association of Women and the Law","description":"Advancing feminist law reform in Canada since 1974","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#organization"},"alternateName":"NAWL","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#organization","name":"The National Association of Women and the Law","alternateName":"NAWL","url":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/fb-OFFRE-DEMPLOI-.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/fb-OFFRE-DEMPLOI-.png","width":940,"height":788,"caption":"The National Association of Women and the Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/#\/schema\/person\/2dbe2702423328393e18cdcbada21da9","name":"NAWL Administrator","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/473d6670c85d99a4bfc81f9449fbba6c5af5929c30af5c5c96bd9e252a554faa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/473d6670c85d99a4bfc81f9449fbba6c5af5929c30af5c5c96bd9e252a554faa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/473d6670c85d99a4bfc81f9449fbba6c5af5929c30af5c5c96bd9e252a554faa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"NAWL Administrator"},"url":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/author\/nawl-admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14596"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14596\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19155,"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14596\/revisions\/19155"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nawl.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}