Raeisi: You support pay equity? Tell me how much you make
Update: Romina Raeisi was interviewed by Robin Bresnahan on CBC Ottawa Morning on April 30, 2018. Link to the interview here.
Op-Ed Published by The Ottawa Citizen on April 19, 2018. Link here.
The author, Romina Raeisi is a third-year French Common Law student at the University of Ottawa. She is enrolled in the Feminist Law Reform course lead by Professor Martha Jackman, NAWL co-chair, and Suki Beavers, NAWL's Project Director.
One topic we never discuss with each other is our salaries. A colleague can ask if you go to church, but not how much you make. That’s a problem because we can’t know how much we should fairly be paid if we never talk about it.
On April 1, Ontario got new legal rules requiring Equal Pay for Equal Work. The new rules require employers to pay the same rates to all employees, including part-time and casual workers, when they complete substantially the same work, with exceptions for factors such as seniority.
Unfortunately, the new rules have a major flaw. It is up to employees to point out when they are being paid unfairly. But how can they know that?
The government has publicly available, fixed-pay structures that indicate how much employees at each level make. A worker can see what level a colleague doing the same work is in, then look up the salary for that position. Unfortunately, in the private sector, unless there is a collective agreement, organizations rarely make this information available.
The lack of transparency in rates of pay, combined with the fact that it is socially unacceptable to talk about our income, means that individuals doing the same work can’t know if they are being paid different rates. This makes the new rules ineffective and allows the unequal pay rates which disadvantage historically discriminated groups (women, minorities, people with disabilities, etc.) to continue.
According to Statistics Canada, women earn 87 cents on average for every dollar earned by men. Even after controlling for industry, occupation, education, age, job tenure, province of residence, marital status and union status, there is still an eight-per-cent difference. Comparing the incomes of people with full-time, full-year jobs, men of colour make 81 cents, while women of colour make only 62 cents for every dollar white men make.
Some differences may be due to overt discrimination, but much of it stems from less obvious factors such as differences in how people negotiate salaries. As my dad always says, no one will give you anything if you don’t ask.
The lack of transparency in rates of pay, combined with the fact that it is socially unacceptable to talk about our income, means that individuals doing the same work can’t know if they are being paid different rates.
Research shows that men negotiate wage increases more often and more aggressively than women. The Harvard Business Review published a study on the starting salaries of recent MBA grads showing that, on average, men received 7.6 per cent more than women, due largely to the fact that men were eight times more likely to negotiate the first offer they received.
Transparent, fixed-pay rates, particularly when combined with the new Equal Pay for Equal Work law, would solve many of these issues.
Of course, this does not mean wages should be inflexible. Our economy works best when we reward hard work and talent. However, employers can take these factors into account by setting a fixed-pay range for each type of position, combined with a list of criteria that will be considered when negotiating individual contracts.
Let me give you an example. Last year, I got a job through the Federal Student Work Experience Program (FSWEP). FSWEP offers fixed rates of pay according to the level of education, from high school to PhD. While the rates are fixed, managers have flexibility in deciding which rate applies, based on years of study, previous experience, previous studies, shortage of students, and enrolment in specialized programs such as law, education and medicine.
The manager initially offered me $16.49/hr. As a second-year law student at the time, I had already completed five years of university studies and had previous work experience. The manager told me they had trouble finding a qualified student. Using the FSWEP pay structure, I found I met the criteria for a rate of $22.04: a 25 per cent jump I wouldn’t have dared ask for otherwise.
Fact is, without this data available, I’d have turned down the job and the manager would have had to hire someone less qualified who might not have been able to do the job. That is the difference fixed, transparent pay rates can make.
Equal Pay for Equal Work is a great initiative. To succeed, it needs us to be willing to tell our colleagues how much we make and for our managers to post rates publicly, either voluntarily or, if necessary, through new legislation.
- NAWL signs Joint Statement calling on Canada to end sterilization of Indigenous women without consent
- Op-ed: While politicians flex, she suffers
- NAWL & Luke’s Place Joint Brief on Bill C-78 Submitted to the Justice and Human Rights Committee
- NAWL appearance before the Finance Committee on Bill C-86, November 6, 2018.
- Laura Schemitsch
- Open Letter to Minister Rodriguez re CCP
- Recommendations from the NAWL consultation on VAW law reform in Canada to the UN SR VAW
- List of Signatories for Right to Housing
- Open Letter Urges Prime Minister to Make Good on His Commitment to the Right to Housing
- Rachael Harder Was Rejected As Committee Chair For Good Reason
- Brief Submitted to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C -71
- Joint Letter on Bill C-71, An Act to amend certain Acts and Regulations in relation to firearms
- Raeisi: You support pay equity? Tell me how much you make
- Cass: The deportation of Lucy Granados shows how hollow government ‘compassion’ is
- Rao: Parental sponsorship rules are antifeminist
- Osien: Gun violence is more than just a gang problem
- Ethans: Here’s why lawyers should advocate for greater diversity in their profession
- Presentation on Bill C-65, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (harassment and violence)
- NAWL Workshop at the 2018 Law Needs Feminism Because National Forum
- Joint Letter calling on the Prime Minister to Enact a National Action Plan on Gender-Based Violence
- NAWL Submission to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
- NAWL leads a group of over 75 organisations calling on Canada to reaffirm the historic mandate of the Court Challenges Program
- Standing Committee on the Status of Women’s hearings on Violence Against Women and Girls in Canada
- NAWL Appeared before the the Special Committee on Pay Equity
- NAWL is proud to join Up for Debate
- Joint Brief on the Impact of Bill C-42 on Women’s Safety
- Feminist Leadership Summit 2011
- Campus Caucuses
- Coalition for Women’s Equality
- Workshop Towards a More Inclusive Maternity/Paternal Benefits Regime
- The Mothering in Law Conference
- Mother’s Day Message to Parliament 2007
- The “Pay Equity Network” in Motion
- International Women’s Day March 2007
- March for Women’s Equality December 2006
- Mother’s Day Message to Parliament 2006
- March for Women’s Equality - Media Coverage